Ethnic apocalypse, p.21
Ethnic Apocalypse, page 21
The three black African countries whose greatest number of nationals we currently welcome are Mali, Senegal and Congo. They are countries whose average IQ level is 74, 76 and 76 respectively. Let us say 75, then, if we average all three figures. In comparison to this, the IQ in France is STILL 98 points,155 despite five decades of intensive immigration. One must be very naïve to believe that this difference — or this chasm, should I say — of 23 points is only due to the ever-thrilling ‘cultural diversity’. The reality is that young black schoolchildren are unable to integrate, not because the teachers of our national education system are mean and racist towards them (the opposite is true, rather), but because they do not have the intellectual capacity to do so. Let the facts be stated, once and for all! I say that African immigration to France, and more generally to Europe, is an ABOMINATION and must be brought to an end as soon as possible.
As for the court Jews often mentioned in this book, including Morin, Todd, Minc, Kouchner and the like, they are all fools who think they are smarter than their own rabbis and, unlike a major part of their community, have chosen to court the invaders, thus neglecting the lessons of history. Let them heed the words of their own prophets, then: after the good wheat, they shall be left with tares.156
Rightly considered traitors by their own people, but also (and especially) by the French, these anti-racist and anti-White leftist Jews will have to watch their backs when the wind turns. Even though, for the time being, they allow themselves to be critical of Israel (a land which these laughable cosmopolites see from a distance as a fascist and conservative country), they will have to consider the option of retreating to the land of their ancestors once the just anger of European identitarians allows the latter to cleanse not only France, but also every other part of the West.
This is not a threat, but a piece of advice.
Appendices
My Own Human Rights Principles
1) What an ideology states and professes must not be judged in accordance with a moral criterion (‘Is it right or wrong?’), but rather with the experimental criterion of effectiveness (‘Is it functional or not?’).
2) Regardless of whether they bear any connection to religion or not, most ideologies fail due to their methodology, since they move from theory to practice, whereas one should proceed from practice to theory.
3) Judeocentrism is a hollow obsession whose causes, meaning and goals cannot be clearly defined. There are some who will claim that the reason I say this lies in my fear of the Jewish lobby, but I am not afraid of anything and am going to die soon. Over the years, I have come to understand that the anti-Semitic reduction of all our current problems to the Jewish question is the most striking form of contemporary conspiracy theories.
4) One never fights against a mere religion, ideology or doctrine: instead, what one battles is, above all, a group of men whose gathering acts as the collective embodiment of such a state of mind.
5) Ethnic homogeneity is the condition for civil peace and prosperity to prevail. As rightly noted by Aristotle, the peaceful and economically viable coexistence of ethnically different populations (cultures and origins) on a single territory is generally impossible. Most of the time, it leads to incessant conflicts, followed by a civil war during which the invaders attempt to replace the natives.
6) In any society or country, it is only a very small allogeneic minority that can successfully integrate through imitation and the renunciation of its original identity. Beyond a given numerical threshold (more than 2% of the population, generally speaking), one is guaranteed to face disorders and conflicts, with the inevitable and gradual creation of ghettos, as each group of people seeks to gather among their own. Assimilation and integration are impossible when it comes to two different cultures, especially when a strong racial ingredient is added to pickle the mixture.
7) Because of its very nature, its spreading of humiliation, its relentless aggressiveness, its inherent desire for both conquest and vengeance, its horrendous barbarities, etc., Islam, which has gone hand in hand with the massive immigration we have experienced over the past four decades, acts as the almost certain trigger of a coming civil war.
8) Under the direction of the Arabs (an excessively sanguinary people), the goal of Islam has, for fourteen long centuries now, lain in the conquest of Europe, whether through violence or not. They also feel the need to take revenge for the shame of having been driven out of our continent on two separate occasions and the humiliation of colonisation. As if under a spell, they will simply never cease to blame us. The Muslim countries of the Gulf, as well as Algeria and Turkey, are all discreetly involved in this conquest venture.
9) Just like any situation where one is faced with a water leak, the solution to our current political situation cannot be found in the approximate and temporary plugging of the leak itself. What we must do, instead, is stop the inpouring before sponging it away and draining it all out.
10) In the medium and long term, what is essential for any nation, especially if it has had the imprudence to admit immigrants, is to provide itself with an indigenous population of generational renewal.
The Contradictions of the Prevailing Ideology
When the Left Generates the Very Opposite of What It Would Like To
An Article Dated 10th March, 2017
The dominant ideology, which does not correspond to the majority’s opinions but merely to the thoughts of a ruling minority in whose values left-wing ingredients are very present indeed, is fraught with increasing, insurmountable and oxymoron-like internal contradictions. What follows are the most blatant ones, divided into several fields, namely economy, immigration, Islam, feminism, education, justice, and others.
The Left and the International Finance Sphere — An Objective Alliance
Socialists strive to justify our national indebtedness and fight against a completely imaginary ‘austerity’, disregarding our balance of public accounts, which is allegedly —wait for it! — ‘ultra-liberal’. And yet, the ever-so-hated world of international finance is pleased with the constantly growing indebtedness of its debtor, France, totalling 100% of its GDP. Socialists and international speculators walk the same path.
For ‘social’ reasons, the anti-capitalistic Left is thus in favour of our chronic budget deficit, while simultaneously abhorring international finance. The latter, however, finances our deficit (for the time being, at least) in the hope that these loans will allow it to earn more and more money. The anti-capitalistic Left therefore acts as its opponent’s cash cow. All of this is, however, partly rigged. Why? Because left-wing political borrowers receive creditors’ commissions to indebt our country.
One Battles a Fictional Sort of Ultra-Liberalism While France Succumbs to Collectivism
All over the world, one proceeds to attack ‘ultra-liberalism’ and ‘austerity’, while France experiences a collectivist economy with more than 57% of our GDP absorbed by the world’s strongest public expenditures; in addition to our shouldering a debt that brings us ever closer to bankruptcy and to our having the heaviest and most confiscatory tax regime for middle classes and businesses, especially in the case of SMEs157 and very small businesses.
France is a collectivist country with an administered, over-regulated and overtaxed economy and an incredible number of civil servants. From this point of view, our land has the worst results of all EU countries (in terms of unemployment, indebtedness, and foreign trade).
The Antiracist Ideology Is Racist
Anti-racists support black and Arab Muslims, who, for their part, are both racist and anti-Semitic. A good example is Mehdi Meklat, a comedian who enjoys great admiration within the mediatic sphere and who went as far as to wish for the advent of a new Hitler to exterminate the Jews (no problem, right?). Or, close to Meklat, there is also Oulaya Amamra, who won the Most Promising Actress César Award. Indeed, she posted several anti-White/racist and homophobic tweets but was forgiven for her actions on account of her ethnic origin, which, as remarked by Ivan Rioufol, is a source of protection against any and all reproach (Le Figaro, 4th February, 2017).
Although widespread, anti-White racism is never prosecuted, simply because it is denied. One only speaks of racism when it impacts the members of our so-called diversity and stems from white authors. Such cases are, incidentally, extremely rare and are generally either falsified or highly exaggerated.
Likewise, anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial are almost never subject to legal punishment when they come from Muslims (which is very common), and are only sanctioned when stemming from native European activists (a rarity by any means).
Defined as an aggravating motive for the commission of a crime or criminal offence, racism only applies to Whites in the standard practice of our courts.
Officially, human races are considered inexistent in France; but, as part of a legal contradiction, racism qualifies as a crime. It is no different from stating that bikes do not exist, but that one is forbidden to cycle.
The CRAN (Representative Council of Black Associations) is not considered racist (although its name clearly is), whereas any potential CRAB (Representative Council of White Associations) would not only be denied the right to administrative registration, but also have its founders hauled into court under charges of racism.
Whereas the term ‘Black Africa’ is both politically correct and tolerated, the expression ‘White Europe’ is strongly frowned upon.
Positive Discrimination and (Anti-White) Statal Racism
Positive discrimination, i.e. the fact of bestowing upon people of colour various benefits, privileges, exemptions and favours so as to compensate for their purported discrimination by society, has not been legalised in France as it has been in American universities (where it is known as ‘affirmative action’), yet it is still implemented in practice — the priority or even systematic hiring of ‘diversity’ members for menial or medium-level jobs in large companies and public offices; higher social welfare and the absence of punishment for fraud; easier access to social housing from which the native French are virtually excluded; etc.
Contrary to the claims of the entire media, the populations of immigrant descent are neither disadvantaged nor excluded, but greatly privileged in every single field, as demonstrated by our urban policy, which entails huge costs but never produces the desired effects.
Even when their asylum application is rejected, third-world illegal migrants (‘invaders’ would be a more appropriate term) are non-expellable and receive more aid than our natives ever could.
The Duplicity and Aberrations of Feminism
Feminist lobbies have had laws passed guaranteeing gender parity in both voters lists and business leadership, all in the name of gender equality. These seemingly egalitarian measures constitute a serious violation of the principle of equal opportunity for all individuals regardless of their sex and origin. They are also contrary to the Declaration of Human Rights, which does not recognise the legitimacy of any quota based on one’s gender and birth conditions.
These measures are, furthermore, particularly harmful to women. With competency-based selection no longer respected, some of the women that end up being elected or recruited on the basis of quotas will not be of the required level. They will thus be said to have benefited from unfair favouritism.
The feministic and anti-racist Left is Islamophilic (as dictated by anti-racism), whereas Islam is essentially misogynistic. Leftist feminists, in fact, support invasive immigration and Islamisation. As for Femen158 members, they attack churches under the pretext that Catholicism is allegedly misogynous (which is both idiotic and false), but are too cowardly to target mosques, although misogyny is one of Islam’s pillars.
Influenced by Islamo-leftism, feminist movements speak of women’s freedom when defending the wearing of the burkini, although we all know perfectly well that it is worn as a means of provocation and that this ridiculous and infamous garment is imposed upon women through threats. Interviewed by Le Figaro (on 7th March, 2017), French-Tunisian journalist Sonia Mabrouk explained that just like the Muslims themselves, these perverted feminists ‘have turned a symbol of domination into an expression of freedom’!
Ecologism vs. Ecology
Leftist ecologists strive to abolish nuclear energy, even though it is actually the least polluting energy source of all.
Dependent on the wind and the sun, and therefore of low efficiency, their famed intermittent ‘renewable energies’ would have to be supported through the presence of coal and gas power plants, as is currently the case in Germany, which declares itself opposed to nuclear power. What this state of affairs does is significantly increase pollutant emissions.
Supposedly less polluting in the long-term, the electric car will, owing to the use of thermal power plants, actually embody a major factor in the prior increase of the consumption (the recharging of batteries), and therefore also the production, of polluting electricity. The electric car is thus a completely wrong choice to make.
In Paris, the restriction of car traffic and the closure of riverbank roads by the green lobby of Mrs Hidalgo do not cause delays in public transport but, on the contrary, monster traffic jams that exacerbate air pollution.
The rejection of the large-scale Rhine-Rhône canal by the members of our green lobby has led to a proliferation of highly polluting lorries on our motorway routes.
Democracy, Populism and Oligarchy — Confusion and Lies
Countries that have the word ‘democracy’ in their names, especially when the latter is associated with the term ‘republic’, are often tyrannies. I would even describe this as a constant.
From the Democratic Republic of the Congo to the former German Democratic Republic, leaders once sought to defend themselves against all accusations of dictatorship by resorting to the following trump card: ‘Come on now, we are a democracy!’ This state of affairs has now fizzled out…
By targeting racism, the dominant ideology is actually castigating another major enemy: populism. To be a democrat and praise democracy — as if it were a secular idol — while simultaneously labelling oneself ‘anti-populist’ is, however, contradictory and absurd. Indeed, the words democracy (Greek etymology) and populism (Latin etymology) have the very same meaning, referring to the sovereignty of a people in the face of an oligarchy.
Imposing its subtle, discreet yet extremely effective tyranny upon France, the oligarchy is afraid of our real people. By means of semantic manipulation, it describes its own domination as being ‘democratic’ and labels the genuine democracy it dreads as ‘populistic’, implicitly assimilating the latter with fascism. It is all a very cynical lie that awakens one’s lust for revolution and blood.
Our Justice System vs. True Justice — A Caste’s Partiality, Politicisation and Abuse of Power
The principle of legal impartiality is no longer credible in France, for a major part of our judicial system is now politicised and biased. Many magistrates do not deliver justice in the name of the French people but in accordance with their own ideological commitments. The education which our National School of Magistracy thus provides is, politically speaking, of a far-leftist nature, perhaps even verging on Islamo-leftism.
The magistracy longs to be both untouchable and sacred, as if it were a kind of secular church erected above our own people. Espousing a totalitarian kind of approach, it prosecutes those who criticise it.
As seen during the Fillon affair,159 for instance, the separation of powers is no longer respected by our courts, which allow themselves to directly intervene in presidential elections.
Draped in its false dignity and feigned impartiality, a part of our justice system submits to the dominant ideology of the hysterical Left, and in a militant manner at that. This fact came to light during the French Judicial Union’s scandalous delinquent slip-ups (‘The Wall of the Morons’ affair,160 etc.).
Many magistrates are impartial only in matters of common law, from which all political or ethnic implications are absent. The dictatorship of unelected judges (especially European ones, who impose their rulings upon our national parliaments); their professional impunity; and their activist partiality are among the main dangers threatening genuine democracy.
As was the case under the Old Regime, our justice system has redefined itself as an autonomous corporation, one that remains independent of the will of the people, of its elected representatives and of our sovereignty. The very notion of a judicial system independent of democratically elected political powers is absurd. This is a false interpretation of Montesquieu’s conception of the separation of powers. Indeed, this charming undemocratic principle results in having an unelected judicial institution become independent of our very laws (which it shamelessly violates), encouraging it to form an autonomous sort of corporation. On the contrary, however, our magistrates should remain completely dependent on our parliamentary and executive legislative power, which stems from our people’s sovereignty, since they are expected to deliver justice ‘in the name of the people’. The actual independence of any justice system is an idea whose essence is tyrannical.
